Freedom, Enslavement and Resistance
Which approach did radical resisters believe was most effective in ending slavery?
Moral suasion
Gradual emancipation through legislation
Direct action and immediate change
Appealing to enslavers' sense of justice
What was a key difference between radical resistance and moral suasion?
Radical resistance sought gradual change, while moral suasion demanded immediate action.
Radical resistance involved direct action and justified violence, while moral suasion relied on persuasion.
Radical resistance focused on economic solutions, while moral suasion focused on political solutions.
Radical resistance aimed to collaborate with enslavers, while moral suasion aimed to overthrow them.
Why did radical resisters view moral suasion as an ineffective strategy?
Because it was too rapid and confrontational.
Because it placed the burden on the enslaved to prove their humanity and was too slow given the urgency of slavery.
Because it involved violent tactics that were counterproductive.
Because it focused on economic solutions rather than moral arguments.
Which of the following is an example of a direct action tactic used by radical resisters?
Writing letters to politicians.
Filing lawsuits against enslavers.
Organizing revolts and armed resistance.
Appealing to religious leaders for support.
Why did radical resisters see violence as a necessary response to slavery?
Because it was the only way to gain political power.
Because it was a way to economically cripple enslavers.
Because the brutality of slavery justified a forceful, immediate reaction.
Because it was a way to gain international support for their cause.
What ethical considerations did radical resisters face when using violent direct action tactics?
Whether violence would alienate potential allies.
Whether violence was morally justifiable given the inherent violence of slavery.
Whether violence would lead to harsher treatment of enslaved people.
All of the above.
What was the main purpose of publications like David Walker's Appeal and Frederick Douglass's Narrative?
To provide economic analysis of the slave trade.
To persuade enslavers to change their ways.
To expose the horrors of slavery and inspire resistance.
To promote gradual emancipation through legal means.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
How did publications detailing slavery's horrors help counter pro-slavery arguments?
By presenting statistical data on the economic costs of slavery.
By offering graphic firsthand accounts to show the true cost of bondage.
By appealing to the religious beliefs of enslavers.
By advocating for gradual integration into American society.
What was the intended impact of publications like David Walker's Appeal on different audiences?
To encourage enslaved people to accept their fate.
To persuade enslavers to gradually improve conditions for the enslaved.
To shock readers and spark outrage, embolden the enslaved to fight for their freedom, and spread radical ideas.
To provide a historical account of the origins of slavery.
According to David Walker, what was a major tool of oppression?
Physical violence
Economic exploitation
Ignorance
Political disenfranchisement