Infinite Sequences and Series (BC Only)
Given , what alternative technique could effectively determine if this alternating sequence diverges without directly applying the nth Term Test?
Conduct Limit Comparison Test with convergent p-series, ineffective since comparison requires positive terms and understanding of limit behavior.
Use the Alternating Series Test after verifying that does not exist or equals infinity.
Employ Taylor Series expansion around , which doesn't simplify analysis for simple power functions like .
Implement Partial Fraction Decomposition and test individual terms' limits, which is inappropriate for non-rational sequences.
Does the harmonic series pass or fail the nth Term Test for Divergence?
It fails because its sequence's limit is not zero.
It passes because its sequence's limit is zero.
It fails because its partial sums decrease without bound.
It passes because its partial sums are bounded above.
What conclusion can be made about the series with general term using only the nth term test?
It diverges based on comparison with geometric series whose ratio's absolute value exceeds one.
The terms go towards an indeterminate form suggesting further analysis or tests are necessary for conclusions on convergence/divergence.
It converges because each term gets smaller as n gets larger due to division by an exponential function in denominator.
No conclusion about convergence can be made since , which is a nonzero constant.
Given the sequence where for , what can be concluded using the nth term test for divergence?
It diverges because does not exist.
It converges because the terms alternate in sign and decrease in absolute value.
It converges since applying L'Hôpital's Rule shows that limit goes to zero.
Nothing can be concluded since .
What does the nth Term Test for Divergence tell us about the series ?
Nothing conclusive since the limit of terms is zero.
The series oscillates indefinitely because the terms are alternating in sign.
The series converges because the terms approach zero.
The series diverges because the limit of terms is not one.
If the sequence defined by is altered to , how does this affect the convergence of the series ?
The series diverges.
There is no change in the convergence of the series.
The series converges conditionally.
The series converges absolutely.
What happens to the convergence of when you replace with ?
It converges absolutely.
It still diverges.
It converges conditionally.
The test is inconclusive for this alteration.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
For which value of does the series fail to pass the nth Term Test for Divergence?
For which of these values would indicate that a sequence may potentially converge when applying the nth term test?
Given a series whose nth term is defined by , what can be concluded about its convergence using the nth Term Test?
It converges because it's an alternating series with decreasing magnitude.
It diverges because .
It converges absolutely because as .
Nothing can be concluded because does not ensure convergence.