Kinetics
What does the symbol ΔH represent in a chemical equation?
Rate constant for a reaction
Activation energy for a reaction
Change in enthalpy
Equilibrium constant
For a reaction A + B ⇌ C + D, which change would not affect the validity of using the steady-state approximation to analyze the system?
Halving the concentration of A.
Doubling the concentration of C.
Decreasing the temperature to reduce reaction rates.
Tripling the initial rate of formation of D.
In applying the steady-state approximation during catalysis, what is assumed about intermediate concentrations?
They continuously decrease until all reactants are converted into products.
They fluctuate widely making it difficult to predict product formation rates.
They remain constant over time once steady state is reached.
They increase proportionally with an increase in substrate concentration.
Why would one choose to use steady state rather than equilibrium assumptions when evaluating certain enzyme-catalyzed reactions?
Similar speed profiles between binding unbinding processes making simpler classic static balance concepts more adequate thus preferred here instead indeed
Characteristically negligible effect from enzymatic presence itself simplifying computational requirements greatly thereby eliminating necessity further methodologies outside traditional ones present circumstances
Virtually instantaneous stabilization among all involved molecular entities thereupon avoiding needing other methodological views altogether due prompt settling occurrence
Enzyme scenarios often involve rapid binding release cycles precluding established equilibria hence necessitating alternative conceptual models like transiently consistent states scenario selections
If during a complex reaction mechanism, an intermediate is produced and consumed at comparably fast rates, what is a likely consequence for applying the steady-state approximation?
The overall activation energy for the reaction will significantly increase.
Reaction intermediates accumulate leading to deviation from steady-state behavior.
The intermediate's concentration will remain relatively low and constant over time.
Product formation will drastically slow down due to decreased availability of intermediates.
Which of the following substances will most likely have the lowest vapor pressure at room temperature?
Propane (C₃H₈), being a nonpolar molecule with only weak dispersion forces.
Acetone ((CH₃)₂CO), having moderate dipole-dipole interactions and some hydrogen bonding capacity.
Ethanol (CH₃CH₂OH), as it engages in extensive hydrogen bonding.
Methane (CH₄), possessing very weak London dispersion forces as its only intermolecular attraction.
In a reaction mechanism involving a steady state, what happens to the rate of formation of intermediates compared to their rate of consumption?
Formation is faster than consumption.
Consumption is faster than formation.
They are equal.
Neither occurs; intermediates are static.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
For a given reaction with intermediate I formed in Step 1 and consumed in Step 2, applying the steady-state approximation would affect which aspect(s) related to intermediate I?
Initial concentration before any steps have occurred particularly
Activation energy required for forming I from reactants exclusively
Thermodynamic stability compared to products or reactants solely
Concentration over time during the reaction course
Considering Le Chatelier's Principle, how might increasing temperature impact use of steady state approximation in endothermic reversible reaction?
Changes in temperature have no effect on the assumptions underlying steady state approximation methods.
Elevated temperature automatically ensures accuracy of steady state approximation by speeding up all reactions equally.
Increased temperature shifts equilibrium toward products, potentially invalidating assumptions of steady state levels of fast reacting intermediates.
Lowered reactant concentrations due to higher temperatures make application of steady state less feasible.
What could happen if the concentration of an intermediate in a reaction mechanism is incorrectly assumed to be insignificant?
Changes to the predicted rate law might not reflect actual reaction behaviors
Thermodynamic calculations would be more accurate because fewer variables are considered
An increase in conversion efficiency from major reactants to products would ensue
Harmonization between reaction rates and activation energies would occur automatically