Kinetics
What molecular geometry would you expect from a central atom with four areas of electron density – two bond pairs and two lone pairs?
T-shaped
Bent or Angular
See-saw
V-shaped
Considering Le Chatelier's Principle, how might increasing temperature impact use of steady state approximation in endothermic reversible reaction?
Changes in temperature have no effect on the assumptions underlying steady state approximation methods.
Elevated temperature automatically ensures accuracy of steady state approximation by speeding up all reactions equally.
Increased temperature shifts equilibrium toward products, potentially invalidating assumptions of steady state levels of fast reacting intermediates.
Lowered reactant concentrations due to higher temperatures make application of steady state less feasible.
What does the symbol ΔH represent in a chemical equation?
Rate constant for a reaction
Activation energy for a reaction
Change in enthalpy
Equilibrium constant
What could happen if the concentration of an intermediate in a reaction mechanism is incorrectly assumed to be insignificant?
Changes to the predicted rate law might not reflect actual reaction behaviors
Thermodynamic calculations would be more accurate because fewer variables are considered
An increase in conversion efficiency from major reactants to products would ensue
Harmonization between reaction rates and activation energies would occur automatically
What does the steady-state approximation assume about the concentration of intermediates in a reaction mechanism?
It decreases exponentially over time.
It oscillates periodically.
It remains constant over time.
It increases linearly over time.
For a reaction A + B ⇌ C + D, which change would not affect the validity of using the steady-state approximation to analyze the system?
Halving the concentration of A.
Doubling the concentration of C.
Decreasing the temperature to reduce reaction rates.
Tripling the initial rate of formation of D.
What does the steady-state approximation assume about the concentrations of intermediates in rapid equilibrium with the surrounding species?
Intermediate concentrations vary widely during the reaction sequence impacting overall rates significantly.
The concentrations of intermediates are negligible compared to those of other reactants or products.
Intermediate concentrations remain stable even though they may form or decompose quickly.
Equilibrium is achieved very early in the reaction mechanism, leading to uniform concentrations of all species.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
In applying the steady-state approximation during catalysis, what is assumed about intermediate concentrations?
They continuously decrease until all reactants are converted into products.
They fluctuate widely making it difficult to predict product formation rates.
They remain constant over time once steady state is reached.
They increase proportionally with an increase in substrate concentration.
Why would one choose to use steady state rather than equilibrium assumptions when evaluating certain enzyme-catalyzed reactions?
Similar speed profiles between binding unbinding processes making simpler classic static balance concepts more adequate thus preferred here instead indeed
Characteristically negligible effect from enzymatic presence itself simplifying computational requirements greatly thereby eliminating necessity further methodologies outside traditional ones present circumstances
Virtually instantaneous stabilization among all involved molecular entities thereupon avoiding needing other methodological views altogether due prompt settling occurrence
Enzyme scenarios often involve rapid binding release cycles precluding established equilibria hence necessitating alternative conceptual models like transiently consistent states scenario selections
Which type of chemical species is typically present at low concentrations and is stabilized by the steady-state approximation in complex reactions?
Catalysts
Intermediates
Products
Reactants