Writing Classes in AP Computer Science A
When defining a constructor within a class in Java, what must the constructor's name be?
Different from the class name to avoid confusion.
Preceded by 'new' to indicate object creation.
The same as any method name.
The same as the class name.
How would declaring all constructors as static methods instead affect instantiating an object within that same Java class?
Constructors defined statically would allow direct invocation via classname negatively impacting encapsulation principles.
Declaring constructors statically would lead to objects sharing a single state defined by said static constructor, resembling singleton pattern.
You cannot declare constructors as static methods therefore such declaration would result in compilation failure.
Static constructors could provide global access for object creation bypassing traditional per-instance construction mechanisms.
If a constructor in a class is mistakenly given the same name as the class but with different capitalization, what will most likely be the result when an object of this class is attempted to be instantiated?
The object will be created with default values regardless of any parameters passed.
A compile-time error occurs because Java is case-sensitive and treats it as a method rather than a constructor.
The object will be created successfully because Java ignores capitalization in identifiers.
A run-time exception occurs due to invalid syntax for naming constructors.
If a class Graph
has overloaded constructors where one accepts an adjacency matrix and another accepts an edge list representation of a graph, which constructor guarantees immediate readiness for breadth-first search (BFS) without additio...
Graph(List
Graph(String serializedGraph)
Graph(int[][] adjacencyMatrix)
Graph()
Given immutable class named "Timestamp" which uses private final fields for storing data alongside parameterized constructor, what potential drawback might arise from having solely single comprehensive constructor taking numerous parameters...
Having only one constructor makes it easier to understand how to create instances of the class since there are no alternatives.
This approach ensures all required values are set upon object construction avoiding any possible need for additional setter methods or field mutations afterwards.
It complicates creation of instances requiring all data upfront which might not always be available or lead to error-prone code.
Providing just one way to create objects reduces chances of incorrect instantiation by eliminating ambiguity in how to use class correctly making overall design cleaner and more intuitive.
In what situation will replacing 'super()' with 'this()' in the first line of a subclass's constructor result in a compilation failure?
When 'this()' refers to an overloaded constructor that doesn't exist within the subclass itself.
If 'this()' correctly calls another overloaded, accessible constructor within the same class hierarchy.
When both superclass and subclass have accessible no-argument constructors defined explicitly.
If 'super()' calls parent class's default no-arg constructor which indeed exists and is accessible.
What will happen if you try to compile a Java class that contains two constructors with exactly the same parameters?
The code will fail to compile due to duplicate method signatures.
Both constructors get merged automatically by the compiler.
An exception is thrown at runtime when an object is instantiated.
The second constructor overwrites the first one.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
If you want to create an instance of a class named Student
, what line of code should you use?
Student s = new Student();
new Student();
Class Student = new Class();
Create(Student);
In Java, if you define only a constructor with arguments for a class, what will happen when you try to create an object without passing any arguments?
The program runs but generates an exception at runtime.
The class reverts to using the default no-argument constructor provided by Java.
An object is created using default values for all fields.
Compilation fails due to the absence of a no-argument constructor.
How does a constructor with no parameters get classified in Java?
- Empty constructor
Default constructor
- Base constructor
- Nullary constructor