ArrayList in AP Computer Science A
When removing elements from an ArrayList<Integer> numbers
, why can't you use a standard forward-traversing for loop without causing errors or skipping elements?
A specific method other than remove() must be used when deleting elements inside a loop.
Elements in 'numbers' cannot be removed during iteration due to Java's concurrent modification rule.
A forward-traversing loop has no impact on index positions when removing elements from 'numbers'.
Removing elements shifts subsequent elements leftward, altering index positions during iteration.
After applying .removeIf()
method call on an ArrayList<Character>
according to some Predicate condition, what could ensure sequential access performance is maintained following structural modifications?
Ensuring timely calls to trimToSize after significant removals based on condition complexity ensuring capacity matches size closely post-modification operations complete ensuring access optimization continues as expected avoiding overhead associated excessively large backing arrays no longer needed given new reduced size collection state post-operations indicates likely improved cache-coherency benefits alongside potential reductions unnecessary memory footprint aspects related specifically sequential data access performance criteria contexts particularly concerning high-volume data processing scenarios potentially involving tight computational resource constraints typically encountered various industry applications such fields as financial services telecommunications perhaps healthcare among others hence general best practice standpoint thereafter ongoing maintenance management perspectives respectively across board terms system efficiency maximization overall spectrum concerned areas under consideration essentially.
For fast access times when retrieving elements by their index values in random order from large datasets, which data structure is more appropriate?
A HashMap provides key-value pairing which may offer unnecessary complexity for indexed retrieval needs.
An ArrayList is more appropriate for fast access times due to constant-time get operations by index value.
A Stack offers Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) operation that does not prioritize indexed access performance.
A Queue enables First-In-First-Out (FIFO) operation but does not support efficient random-access retrieval by index like an ArrayList does.
Which statement correctly checks if an ArrayList called numbers
contains no elements?
numbers.length() == 0
numbers.isEmpty()
numbers.hasNoElements()
numbers.size() == -1
How should we avoid an infinite loop when adding elements to an ArrayList during traversal with an indexed for loop?
Set the loop variable to zero inside the loop body before the loop incrementation
Decrement the loop variable inside the loop body before the loop incrementation
Increment the loop variable inside the loop body before the loop incrementation
We can’t avoid an infinite loop using a regular for loop and must use an enhanced for loop instead
What could likely happen if an ArrayList
method that modifies the list (like add or remove) is called within a for-each loop iterating through that same ArrayList
?
The iterator variable gets updated with new values after each modification.
Only additions but not removals disrupt the for-each loop.
ConcurrentModificationException is thrown.
The method executes without any issue every time it's called.
Which ArrayList methods do we use in the for loop implementation of traversing an ArrayList?
get() and length()
size() and length()
get() and size()
set() and size()

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
Assuming list
is a non-empty ArrayList<Integer>
, what does list.set(list.size() - 1, -5)
accomplish?
It appends -5 to the start of list.
It replaces the last element of list with -5.
It removes all occurrences of -5 from list before adding one at end position (size-1).
It inserts -5 at position (size -1) and shifts other elements rightward.
If we delete an element at index i during traversal of an ArrayList, what must we do before inside the loop body, before the loop incrementation, to avoid skipping an element?
i = 0
i = 1
i--
i++
In what scenario might a programmer prefer using methods specifically designed for ArrayLists over those available through the List interface when dealing with data manipulation operations?
A programmer might prefer methods specifically designed for ArrayLists over those available through the List interface when efficiency is a concern.
Ultimately, ArrayList has more efficient implementations for certain operations than methods defined in the generic List interface.
Correct answer - explains why ArrayList is referred to as providing specific method implementations, while the List interface represents the general case that may not be optimized for a particular use case.