Claims, Reasoning, and Evidence

Including personal anecdotes and testimonials

Structuring the argument in a way that is easy to follow and makes logical sense

Introducing new information in the conclusion paragraph

Using informal and colloquial language

Using complex vocabulary to make the claim seem more convincing without evidence.

Stating personal opinions without backing them up with any kind of external reference.

By including relevant evidence like facts, statistics, or examples from credible sources.

Repeating the claim several times throughout the paragraph for emphasis.

Dismissing all opposition to gun control as unreasonable without further discussion.

Acknowledging hunters' rights before pivoting to the necessity of regulation for public safety.

Deriding alternative viewpoints on gun control using emotional language and mockery.

Citing numerous statistics about gun violence without addressing any counterarguments.

To meet word count requirements even if additional context adds no value to arguments being presented.

To ensure relevancy by connecting arguments to current situations or specific circumstances addressed by their text.

To insert technical jargon that may confuse readers unfamiliar with subject-specific language usage habits.

To use historical examples exclusively for backing every claim made in each paragraph without regard for current relevance.

Counterarguments

New information

Restatement of the thesis

Transition words

It narratively unfolds the historical development of educational practices over time.

It provides subjective experiences from individuals who prefer one method over another.

It builds suspense by withholding key comparisons until later paragraphs in the essay.

It offers clarity by methodically analyzing similarities and differences between both educational approaches.

Repeat information already stated verbatim.

Introduce a completely new topic abruptly.

Summarize the entire essay briefly.

Link ideas smoothly together.

Arguing that since some countries don’t use standardized tests, they are inherently unnecessary for educational assessment.

Presenting statistical data showing test scores do not correlate with long-term academic success and offering alternative assessment methods.

Describing personal stories from students who performed poorly on tests despite being knowledgeable in the subject area.

Pointing out historical figures who were successful without excelling at standardized tests to undermine their value.

Statistics provided by government agencies or reputable organizations relevant to your topic.

Anecdotes based on rumors not confirmed by reliable sources.

Direct quotes from experts in the field being discussed in your paper.

Data derived from scientific research studies with proper citations.

Summarize each source sequentially without making connections between their differing opinions on sustainability issues.

Dismiss conflicting sources outright rather than analyzing their arguments in relation to advocating for sustainable practices effectively.

Choose one source as primary and only briefly mention others without fully exploring their distinct viewpoints on sustainability.

Integrate contrasting perspectives and use logical reasoning to advance their stance on sustainable practices’ necessity.