How writers develop arguments, intros, and conclusions
Which of the following should a rhetorical analysis thesis primarily convey?
In what way can an author effectively integrate new empirical studies into an existing cause-and-effect organizational pattern without diminishing its clarity?
When an author introduces new evidence that contradicts their original claim, which rhetorical strategy would best allow them to maintain credibility while adjusting their argument?
When adjusting an argument in response to new evidence, what should be avoided?
How might an author who wants to adapt Jane Austen's sarcastic observations of class and marriage from Pride and Prejudice apply those techniques to critique big data's role in consumerism?
What is the main difference between 'occasion' and 'exigence'?
What rhetorical device would best enable a writer who initially proposed a causal relationship but later discovered complex multiple causes instead?
How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
How does an understanding of the feminist movement in the early 20th century enhance a reader's interpretation of rhetorical techniques used in Virginia Woolf's "A Room of One's Own"?
In adjusting an argument after encountering strong conflicting data, which stylistic choice can maintain an author's persuasiveness?
If an author wants to adjust their argument against fast food due to new links found between fast food consumption and cognitive decline, which phrase should they use for maximum impact?