How a writer brings all parts of an argument together
In constructing an enduring narrative about cultural heritage, what tactic should writers avoid so as not to undermine their message?
In order to maintain focus on your central claim, what should you avoid including excessive amounts?
Which word choice could undermine the cohesiveness of an argument that predominantly uses formal language to discuss judicial processes?
If someone insists their claim is right because 'that's how it's always been done,' which logical fallacy are they committing?
What role does a consistent tone play in maintaining ideas throughout an argument?
How does a metaphor contribute to maintaining ideas throughout an argument?
Which stylistic feature most effectively enhances an argument by appealing to the audience's emotions?
How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
When analyzing two opinion pieces regarding tax reform policies, which element should be prioritized to evaluate how effectively each maintains its central idea?
What rhetorical device is best suited to demonstrating causal relationships in an editorial piece?
When constructing an argument, what technique best integrates advanced logical reasoning by anticipating and systematically refuting counterarguments?