Factor Markets
Which of the following is a difference between a perfectly competitive labor market and a monopsony?
The quantity of labor demanded.
The wage rate paid to workers.
The number of buyers and sellers in the market.
The firm's control over the labor market.
Assuming other factors remain constant, what would happen if government-imposed price floors were removed in an agricultural market characterized by both monopoly sellers and monopsony buyers?
Quantity traded might reduce if both monopolists and monopsonists exert their market power by restricting output and offering lower prices respectively.
Prices drop significantly due to increased competition among sellers who were previously restricted by price floors.
Prices would rise dramatically as monopolists take advantage of their position with less regulatory interference.
The quantity traded increases substantially as efficiency gains from deregulation drive down costs and increase production incentives for monopolies.
In the context of a monopsony, what does the term "willingness to sell" refer to?
The maximum wage workers are willing to accept.
The quantity of labor workers are willing to demand.
The minimum wage workers are willing to accept.
The quantity of labor workers are willing to supply.
Which factor contributes most directly toward creating barriers that result in monopsonic job markets?
Incorrectly fostering technological advances increasing efficiency within industry
Correcting physical barriers like geographic isolation which limit alternative employment opportunities
Incorrectly promoting healthy competition among small local businesses
Incorrectly introducing strict government regulations restricting entry into industries
In a monopsony labor market, if an employer chooses to hire another worker, which factor is considered its opportunity cost?
The price at which competitors are willing to hire extra labor away from the firm.
The difference between marginal revenue product and marginal resource cost for the last worker hired.
The value of goods or services that could have been produced instead by other uses of resources.
The monetary savings from not having to pay higher wages for additional labor force.
When a firm in a monopsony market faces the decision to buy a machine or to hire a new worker for the same task, what is the opportunity cost associated with choosing the machine?
The next best employment opportunities lost due to replacing human labor with automation.
The increased ability of a production line through the purchase of a machine compared with establishing a human workforce.
The additional training and development dedicated to training new employees as opposed to purchasing machinery.
The potential public relations backlash from not supporting jobs in the community by preferring machines over people.
What is a likely outcome when a monopsony employer is the only buyer of labor in a market?
There is increased competition for jobs leading to higher wages.
Labor demand becomes perfectly elastic due to the lack of alternatives for workers.
Wage rates are lower than they would be in a competitive labor market.
Workers have more negotiating power as there's only one employer to focus on.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
When analyzing a monopsonist's decision on whether or not to employ an additional worker, what primarily constitutes its opportunity cost?
The decrease in product prices due to increased market supply by adding another worker.
Savings gained by spreading fixed costs over greater levels of output with more employees.
The marginal increase in total wages paid out resulting from higher wages for all workers.
Profits lost from spending less time focusing on capital investment strategies and innovation efforts because of new hires' orientation processes.
In a monopsony, the firm pays workers a wage that is?
Equal to their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Unrelated to their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Above their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Below their marginal revenue product (MRP).
In a monopsony market, what effect would improved public transportation have on its workforce?
Improved transportation has no impact on workforce availability or firm hiring practices in a monopsony market.
It will decrease worker mobility and allow firms to reduce wages due to lower competition.
It may increase the number of available workers, making it easier for firms to hire without raising wages significantly.
Better transportation leads directly to higher wages as firms compete more intensely for workers who can travel easily.