Factor Markets
Which of the following is a difference between a perfectly competitive labor market and a monopsony?
The quantity of labor demanded.
The wage rate paid to workers.
The number of buyers and sellers in the market.
The firm's control over the labor market.
Assuming other factors remain constant, what would happen if government-imposed price floors were removed in an agricultural market characterized by both monopoly sellers and monopsony buyers?
Quantity traded might reduce if both monopolists and monopsonists exert their market power by restricting output and offering lower prices respectively.
Prices drop significantly due to increased competition among sellers who were previously restricted by price floors.
Prices would rise dramatically as monopolists take advantage of their position with less regulatory interference.
The quantity traded increases substantially as efficiency gains from deregulation drive down costs and increase production incentives for monopolies.
In a monopsony labor market, if an employer chooses to hire another worker, which factor is considered its opportunity cost?
The price at which competitors are willing to hire extra labor away from the firm.
The difference between marginal revenue product and marginal resource cost for the last worker hired.
The value of goods or services that could have been produced instead by other uses of resources.
The monetary savings from not having to pay higher wages for additional labor force.
In a monopsony, the firm pays workers a wage that is?
Equal to their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Unrelated to their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Above their marginal revenue product (MRP).
Below their marginal revenue product (MRP).
If a dominant firm employs price leadership in an oligopolistic input market with few suppliers, what outcome might resemble that found in monopsony markets?
A price war among suppliers ensues, leading all firms towards perfect competition conditions over time.
Suppliers innovate aggressively leading to rapid technological advancement and reduced input costs across industries.
Input prices are driven down below competitive levels due to collective bargaining power against suppliers.
Suppliers merge forming monopolies themselves hence nullifying any influence from oligopoly-based price leadership tactics used by buyers.
In terms of social well-being, how does imposing an excise tax on goods produced under conditions of monopsony affect allocative efficiency?
Allocative efficiency improves because taxation corrects for negative externalities created by monopolistic production methods.
There's no significant impact on allocative efficiency because taxes are fully passed on consumers with little change in producer behavior.
Allocative Efficiency generally worsens because taxation further distorts resource allocation away from socially optimal levels.
Taxation has minimal effect on allocative efficiency since monopoly produces already deviate significantly from producing socially optimal quantities.
Which curve represents the demand for labor in a monopsony?
Marginal product curve
MRP curve
Marginal cost curve
Supply curve

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
Which scenario best illustrates the concept of opportunity cost in a monopsonistic labor market?
A monopoly occurs whenever single entity controls entire industry sector thereby limiting access competitive alternatives.
Monopolists are firms that face little competition and can influence prices through their level of production.
Monopoly power refers generally both those entities who hold significant sway over specific industries/sectors.
Choosing between hiring an additional worker or maintaining current employment levels at lower wage rates per worker.
How does a common resource differ from a public good when considering problems associated with market efficiency?
Unlike public goods, common resources are rivalrous which leads to overuse and depletion of the resource.
Common resources, like public goods, are both non-excludable and non-rivalrous, creating identical economic issues.
Both experience under-consumption issues since their benefits cannot be restricted only to those who pay for them.
Common resources provide excludability features that prevent non-payers from consumption, ensuring efficiency.
Which of these industries might be considered an example of a monopsonistic market?
An agricultural produce market with many farmers selling their goods to consumers directly at a farmers' market.
A small town with only one factory hiring workers.
Online retail platforms where numerous third-party sellers offer products to global consumers.
A metropolitan area with multiple tech firms competing for engineers.