Team, Transform, and Transmit

Using highly technical language to demonstrate expertise.

Tailoring the language and explanations to match the audience's level of knowledge.

Presenting all research data in exhaustive detail.

Focusing primarily on the presenter's personal accomplishments.

Reading directly from the research paper to ensure accuracy.

Using monotone voice to maintain a formal tone throughout the presentation.

Presenting data without any narrative or storytelling.

Structuring the presentation as a compelling story with a clear beginning, middle, and end.

Ignoring the audience's views and presenting your data as irrefutable facts.

Acknowledging the audience's perspectives and addressing potential counterarguments respectfully.

Using aggressive language to assert the superiority of your research findings.

Avoiding the controversial aspects of your research to prevent conflict.

To increase the length of the paper to meet the minimum word count.

To identify and correct errors, improve clarity, and strengthen the overall argument.

To add more sources to the bibliography to demonstrate thorough research.

To change the topic of the paper if the initial research proves unfruitful.

The font size and margins.

Grammatical errors, sentence clarity, proper design, and logical inconsistencies.

The number of citations per paragraph.

The inclusion of personal anecdotes to make the paper more engaging.

Replacing all instances of passive voice with active voice.

Reorganizing the paper's structure to ensure a logical flow of ideas.

Adding more complex vocabulary to impress the reader.

Focusing solely on correcting grammatical errors.

It guarantees a perfect final paper.

It is a mandatory requirement for all research projects.

It provides different perspectives and may catch errors you missed.

It allows peers to grade each other's work.

Vague comments about the overall paper quality.

Personal attacks on the author's writing abilities.

Specific suggestions for improvement with supporting explanations.

Focusing solely on grammatical errors without addressing content.

Ignoring the feedback and assuming the reviewer did not understand the methodology.

Adding more technical jargon to the methodology section to demonstrate expertise.

Revising the methodology section to provide a clearer and more detailed explanation of the research process.

Removing the methodology section altogether to avoid further confusion.

To identify flaws in your research design.

To fulfill a mandatory assignment requirement.

To reflect on your writing, thinking, and creative processes, and the significance of the inquiry.

To rewrite your research paper from a different perspective.