Team, Transform, and Transmit

Rely on verbal agreements and document formal permission steps taken.

Ignore ethical guidelines as long as the research is deemed valuable to the scholarly community.

Obtain informed consent from all participants to ensure transparency and privacy protection.

Exclude sensitive topics from interviews to avoid complications altogether.

Translating surveys is unnecessary since most educated individuals have proficiency in English as an international language.

It violates ethical standards by introducing potential biases from mistranslations or idiomatic expressions.

Translation increases complexity without significantly enhancing the quality or reliability of collected data.

To ensure accurate responses by allowing participants to express themselves fully in their native language.

Reading unrelated novels or genre studying to investigate.

Discussing the latest movie trends with colleagues at a lunch break.

Creating a detailed outline incorporating key concepts and research questions.

Freewriting random thoughts unrelated to a specific subject matter.

Cross-sectional surveys measuring individual creativity at a single point in time within teams.

Case studies focusing on successful innovative teams without considering individual contributions.

Experimental designs manipulating group compositions based on creative assessments.

Longitudinal ethnographic studies observing team interactions over time across multiple projects.

Consider exclusively those studies that support a single theoretical framework.

Read only abstracts of papers without delving into full text details.

Track changes in research focus and methodology over time among different studies.

Limit the review to the most cited articles within the last year only.

Examine areas where there is limited or contradictory information.

Disregard recent studies in favor of classical theories and models.

Overlook key studies that do not align with the student's research hypothesis.

Focus solely on well-established findings to reinforce the current understanding.

Selecting the theory with the largest empirical support as the foundational model

Adhering strictly to neoclassical economic assumptions for theoretical consistency

Analyzing divergent theories through comparative evaluation to synthesize a reconciliatory model.

Excluding older economic theories deemed less relevant in modern contexts

By employing statistical analysis of academic retention rates supplemented by detailed interviews exploring personal challenges.

By focusing purely on institutional policy reviews with no regard for individual student narratives or success metrics.

To exclude outlier cases from secondary sources streamline convergence toward expected trends maintain cohesion narrative.

To reconsider underlying theoretical assumptions informing expectations by closely scrutinizing alignment between theory, literature, and empirical observations.

To confirm accuracy secondary source information through cross-verification additional external resources before making any conclusions.

To prioritize refinement their investigative instruments assuming flaws therein led observational inconsistencies.

It enables you to form arguments based solely on historical precedent in your field.

It gives you templates to replicate past experiments without modification.

It encourages reliance on traditional methods at the expense of innovation.

It allows you to build upon their approaches or address limitations they encountered.