Sampling Distributions
If the sample sizes from two independent populations are unequal, how does this affect the standard error of the difference in sample means when variances are equal?
It decreases compared to when sample sizes are equal.
There is no effect on the standard error.
It increases compared to when sample sizes are equal.
The effect on the standard error depends on the actual mean values, not sample sizes.
When conducting a hypothesis test for the difference between two means with unequal variances and different sample sizes, which method should be used to account for these conditions?
The pooled t-test.
The z-test with pooled variance.
The paired t-test.
The Welch's t-test.
Which of the following is the parameter for sampling distribution for the difference in sample means?
p
If all members of selected groups are included in the sample, what sampling method is being used?
Random-digit dialing
Cluster sampling
Proportional stratified sampling
Stratified sampling
How does increasing variability within each group being compared impact power when testing differences between group means?
Power is not affected by within-group variability changes as it only pertains to between-group differences.
Power increases due to greater discernibility provided by wider data spread within groups making real differences clearer.
Within-group variability has an inverse square root relationship with power affecting its magnitude proportionally less with larger variances.
Power decreases because increased variability inflates the standard errors and makes detecting a true difference harder.
Which condition must be met to use a normal model to approximate a sampling distribution for differences in sample means?
One sample size must be more than twice as large as another.
Both populations have equal variances.
At least one population is not normally distributed.
Both populations are normally distributed or both sample sizes are large.
What is one potential consequence on Type II error rates if one conducts multiple comparisons among several group means but fails to adjust significance levels accordingly?
Fluctuates unpredictably as influences from failing adjustments affect various test conditions differently regarding sensitivity and specificity trade-offs.
It remains unchanged while increasing Type I errors because Type II errors depend on non-rejection regions which unadjusted thresholds do not alter.
Decreases dramatically since failure to adjust thresholds raises both types of errors uniformly across comparisons.
Increases due mainly because non-adjustment leads directly more false negatives across multiple tests given constant overall alpha level.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
Which method involves dividing a population into groups before sampling?
Convenience sampling
Cluster sampling
Systematic sampling
Stratified sampling
What would be the center of the sampling distribution for the difference in sample means if the true population means for strawberry ice cream is 300 scoops and chocolate ice cream is 500 scoops?
180 scoops.
200 scoops.
210 scoops.
190 scoops.
When comparing two independent samples to find their mean difference, which statistical term do you use to describe its consistency from one experiment to another?
Skewness
Covariance
Kurtosis
Variability