Sustained Investigation Rubric

Adam Green
8 min read
Listen to this study note
Study Guide Overview
This AP Art & Design study guide covers the Sustained Investigation (SI) section, focusing on key components like the 15 required images and written statements. It explains the scoring rubric with examples for each row: Inquiry, Practice, Experimentation, Revision (PER), Materials, Processes, Ideas (MPI), and Skills. The guide emphasizes connecting visual evidence to the inquiry and achieving synthesis between MPI. It also includes memory aids, tips, common mistakes, practice questions, and a scoring breakdown example.
#AP Art & Design: Sustained Investigation - The Night Before π
Hey there! Feeling the pre-exam jitters? Don't worry, we've got this! This guide is designed to be your quick-reference, confidence-boosting companion for the AP Art & Design exam. Let's break down the Sustained Investigation (SI) section and make sure you're fully prepped. Remember, it's all about showing your artistic journey, not just the final product.
#π Sustained Investigation: Your Artistic Journey
This section is all about demonstrating your growth, exploration, and understanding of artistic concepts. It's worth a significant chunk of your score, so let's dive in!
#Key Components
- 15 Images: Showcasing your artistic process, not just final pieces.
- Written Statements: Explaining your inquiry and how your work demonstrates P, E, and R (Practice, Experimentation, Revision).
#
What to Remember
- Your inquiry should be the driving force behind your work.
- It's about the journey, not just the destination.
- Connect your written statements to your visual evidence.
#π The Scoring Rubric: Demystified
Let's break down each row of the rubric to understand exactly what the AP graders are looking for.
#Row A: Inquiry (12%)
- Focus: Is your work a visual response to your stated inquiry?
- 1 Point: Inquiry is stated, but visual evidence is unrelated or missing.
- 2 Points: Inquiry is stated, and there's an attempt to connect it to the visual evidence, but it's not fully successful.
- 3 Points: Inquiry is clear, and the visual evidence directly supports and answers the question. There may be some unevenness in the quality of work.
#
Example
Inquiry: "How can I use the translucent properties of oil paint to represent the beautiful variety of skin tones through underlying colors in portraits of POC?"
- 1 Point: You state the inquiry, but your images are random paintings in various media, not all portraits, not all POC, not all oil.
- 2 Points: You state the inquiry, and your images...

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve