Foundations of American Democracy
Which argument did James Madison present in Federalist No. 10 to defend the creation of a large republic as a solution for controlling factions?
A large republic would have a greater variety of parties and interests, making it more difficult for any single faction to dominate.
The presence of multiple factions in a small republic would naturally cancel each other out, ensuring stability.
A large republic would allow for direct democracy where factions can be directly controlled by the majority's vote.
A small republic would ensure better communication between representatives and their constituents, reducing factionalism.
What reason did Brutus give in his first essay for opposing the constitution being ratified?
He believed that the vastness of America would lead to an unmanageable central government.
He believed there were too many clauses open to interpretation in the proposed constitution.
He thought that individual states should have their own constitutions instead.
He felt that the constitution lacked sufficient protection for individual rights.
How Do Both Federalists no;.I0 And BrutuS NO.;I Address ThE Issue O F `THE COMMON GOOD '
They Both Discuss How Different Forms Of GOVERNMENT Try TO Balance Individual Interests With Public Welfare.
They both suggest THAT A Strong Military Presences Is Essential FOR Protecting The Common Good From Internal Threats.
They both Advocate FOR Direct Participation BY Citizens TO Ensure THAT The Common Good Is Served.
They Both Recommend Allocating More Power To Local Governments As They Are Closer To People's Daily Needs And The Common Good.
How does the perspective on size and scope of government differ between Federalist No.10 and Brutus I?
Both advocate for a large centralized government.
Both support smaller governments that prioritize states' rights.
Brutus I supports a large republic, while Federalist No .10 prefers smaller ones prioritizing states' rights.
Federalist No.10 favors a large republic, but Brutus I prefers a smaller one protecting states' rights.
How does Brutus 1 contribute to understanding debates over judicial power in today’s context?
He warned about the Supreme Court's unchecked power—a debate still relevant today.
He advocated for legislative supremacy—now considered an antiquated view.
Brutus proposed limiting people's voting rights—an idea largely rejected now.
He endorsed executive authority—less pertinent in current discourses.
Which document argues that a large territory will help control the effects of minority factions?
Brutus I Essay
Federalist No.10
The U.S Constitution
Declaration Of Independence
According to Federalist No. 10, what is the purpose of a strong central government?
To control the destructive effects of factions.
To concentrate power in the hands of a few elites.
To ensure equal representation for all citizens.
To suppress individual rights and freedoms.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
What concern about the proposed Constitution is expressed in Brutus No. 1?
It cautions against the use of impeachment trials, viewing them as destabilizing to political order.
It argues that direct elections for president would lead to foreign influence in American politics.
It worries that too much federal power might endanger states' rights and individual liberties.
It fears that without a Bill of Rights, the military could override civilian government decisions.
How did James Madison, in Federalist No. 10, propose to mitigate the negative effects of factions in a large republic?
Instituting a strict system of checks and balances between various factions.
By expanding the sphere of the republic to encompass a variety of interests and factions.
By limiting citizen participation in government to reduce factionalism.
Through direct democracy to ensure majority rule.
What is the main concept behind "factions" as described in Federalist No.10 ?
Groups with specific political or economic interests
Different branches of government
Political parties formed during elections
Representatives elected from different states