Branches of Government

The Judiciary would likely become an extension of Congress, simply enforcing laws passed by legislature.

America's legal systems would shift towards a civil law tradition rather than common law tradition.

It could diminish the role of courts in determining constitutionality, potentially undermining checks and balances system.

The Executive Branch would assume responsibility for reviewing constitutionality.

By holding state referendums to override specific decisions of federal courts.

By proposing and ratifying constitutional amendments that alter the judiciary's jurisdiction or processes.

By issuing binding resolutions that limit federal court rulings within their borders.

By directly appointing judges to the federal courts through state legislatures.

A constitutional amendment can be proposed and passed to reverse it.

The President can veto the decision within 10 days of its issuance.

Citizens can sue the court for unfair ruling which may lead to reversal of decision.

The Congress can call for re-voting in Supreme Court on same case.

Increased workload leading to slow decision-making

Difficulty in removing justices who commit crimes

Lack of diversity among justices

The potential to shift the ideological balance of the court for extended periods

It prevents concentration and abuse of power in one branch of government.

It allows for direct public influence over court cases and legal proceedings.

It causes gridlock and inefficiency in decision-making processes.

It increases partisan conflict within different branches of government.

Impeachment of Justices

Issuing legislative vetoes

Passing new legislation

Invoking the Congressional Review Act

By modifying the impact of a Court decision after it has been made

All of the above

By amending the Constitution in relation to the Court

By changing the Court's jurisdiction

Passing executive orders to counteract judicial decisions.

Imposing legislative vetoes on court rulings.

Nominating judges with similar ideological stances.

Directly amending court opinions after issuance.

Mandating unanimous consent from states fortifies states' rights by giving them direct influence over national Constitutional interpretations.

An amendment demanding statewide approval for interpretive changes may incentivize greater collaboration between state governments.

Unanimous consent requirements could paralyze constitutional jurisprudence, as achieving consensus among states is often impractical due to differing regional interests and political ideologies.

Consensus among state legislatures prior to changes taking effect might cultivate nationwide uniformity in Constitutional interpretation.

Directly removing sitting Supreme Court Justices from office.

Nominating Justices who share similar interpretations of constitutional law.

Vetoing Supreme Court rulings he disagrees with.

Establishing lower courts without Senate confirmation.