Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

First Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment

Nineteenth Amendment

Fifteenth Amendment

It enforced stricter federal oversight on state election laws due to continued concerns about discrimination.

It has led states to pass more stringent voter ID requirements, arguing for protection against elector fraud.

It has allowed states with a history of discrimination to change election laws without federal approval.

It has prompted many states to reinstate previously banned practices like literacy tests and poll taxes.

Ratification process initiated at state level for a constitutional amendment securing privacy rights beyond Fourth Amendment limits.

Utilization of referendums allowing citizens to vote on surveillance policies implemented by state law enforcement agencies.

Passage of laws restricting authorities' ability to conduct warrantless searches contrary to federal standards.

Incorporation doctrine applications extending states' own search regulations nationwide.

Second Amendment

Fifth Amendment

Thirteenth Amendment

Eighth Amendment

Legislation increasing transparency requirements for political donations.

Bills introducing stricter public financing options for campaigns.

Laws setting even lower limits on individual contributions to candidates.

Acts creating additional barriers for entry into electoral races by independents.

Due to increased education levels among younger populations post-war.

Increase in military service by young individuals resulted in lowered voter turnout until amendment.

Protest against youth being drafted without having a political voice prompted its adoption.

Fear of communist influence led young people to demand more representation.

It expanded suffrage by lowering the voting age from 21 to 18, broadening youth participation in elections.

Incorrect Answer

Incorrect Answer

Incorrect Answer

Judges typically apply it solely on issues related to citizenship rights.

They consistently limit its scope only to cases involving federal government action.

They commonly use it for incorporating federal rights onto states.

Courts regularly interpret it as allowing any state laws that violate personal liberties.

The Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses provide similarly worded protections for individual rights.

Equal Protection Clause prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws, whereas Due Process Clause protects individuals from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without legal proceedings.

Both clauses are designed to protect individual rights against infringement by federal government.

While both clauses defend citizens' liberties, only the Due Process Clause ensures fair treatment through normal judicial system.

It enhanced states' executive control at a federal level while simultaneously diminishing their legislative influence.

It had no significant effect on state sovereignty since it only affected election procedures and not policy-making authority.

It reduced state power over federal legislation by mandating direct election rather than state legislature appointment of U.S Senators.

It increased states' legislative powers by expanding their role in amending federal policies through their senators.