American Political Ideologies and Beliefs
How does dual federalism differ fundamentally from cooperative federalism?
Dual focuses on judicially resolving disputes among levels whilst cooperative promotes legislative supremacy over other branches' roles in governance.
Cooperative has clear divisions between state and national powers; dual involves shared functions across levels of governance.
Dual maintains distinct layers of government without intermixing duties, while cooperative blur lines through collaboration on issues.
Dual holds that states should be superior, whereas cooperative puts national interests first above all else.
Which of the following policy approaches would most likely lead to an immediate decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles?
Offering tax incentives for long-term research into renewable energy technologies.
Subsidizing the oil industry to lower fuel costs for consumers.
Increasing funding for highways and infrastructure development.
Implementing a carbon tax on vehicle emissions.
Which amendment abolished slavery in United States?
The nineteenth amendment.
The fifteenth amendment.
The thirteenth amendment.
The fourteenth amendment.
Which historical event prompted significant changes to federal emergency management policies due to its widespread impact on intergovernmental relations?
Hurricane Katrina
Space Race
Vietnam War
Watergate Scandal
How might the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause affect federal regulatory power?
Limit Congress to regulate only intrastate commerce.
Exclude any form of commercial activity from congressional legislation.
Expand the scope of federal regulations on economic activity.
Delegate regulatory power exclusively to state governments.
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates a limitation of the president's power due to checks and balances?
The president issues an executive order to implement a new policy.
The president appoints a new member to their cabinet without any opposition.
The president vetoes a bill passed by Congress.
The Senate rejects a treaty negotiated by the president.
How might a parliamentary system handle the confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice differently than the United States government?
The Prime Minister would recommend a nominee who is then usually confirmed by the majority party without extensive hearings.
The Judiciary Committee would conduct public hearings before the full chamber votes on confirmation.
A separate judicial panel would nominate justices, and the parliament would vote without debate.
Justices would be elected directly by citizens in a national vote, eliminating parliamentary involvement.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
When the Supreme Court declares an act of Congress unconstitutional, which principle is being applied that exemplifies checks and balances?
Legislative supremacy
Executive privilege
Judicial review
Federalism
If the United States had a multi-party system with proportional representation, how could this affect legislation like healthcare reform?
The President's party could easily pass reforms as long as they have simple majority support among voters nationwide.
Legislation like healthcare reform wouldn't be influenced significantly as individual representatives still vote based on constituents' needs.
Coalition governments may form leading to compromises that reflect varied interests resulting in more moderate policies.
Party-line voting would be stricter, making it harder to pass significant healthcare reforms without complete control of Congress.
Which Supreme Court Case has most significantly shaped policies related expansion administrative agencies' discretionary power?
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984)
FCC v. Fox Television Stations (2009)
City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
Ashwander v. TVA (1936)