Composite, Implicit, and Inverse Functions
How does one approach the differentiation of using chain rule while avoiding common mistakes associated with nested functions?
Assume the derivatives are related linearly and apply the rule accordingly.
Include the derivative of arcsine instead of tangent, incorrect assumption.
Split into separate terms and differentiate individually without considering effects of nesting.
Apply chain rule each layer starting from the outermost function and proceeding to the most inner function.
If is differentiable at , what can we conclude about the continuity of at ?
is continuous at .
Only the continuity of can be concluded, not .
The continuity of cannot be determined from the given information.
is not continuous at .
If , and you need to find given that and , what is the value of using the Chain Rule?
0
9
-20
20
For a nested function defined as where derivatives at specific points for functions p, q, r, s, t are known, which method provides a more efficient means to find ?
Using chain rule successively for each layer starting from inside out.
Taking advantage of implicit differentiation treating each layer as an implicit variable.
Applying product rule on split parts of the composite function.
Integrating each individual function before applying differentiation rules.
If and while , what is the derivative of at ?
108
12
75
24
If , what is ?
Find the derivative of the function at x=0 using the chain rule.
-8
8
-4
4

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
A function satisfies . Which expression could represent ?
If and , what is the derivative of with respect to ?
What is the derivative of sin(9x - 8)?
9cos(x)
sin(9)
9cos(9x-8)
−9cos(8−9x)