Composite, Implicit, and Inverse Functions
Given that the derivative of an inverse function can be found using , calculate if it's known that for a certain value of c, and .
2
-0.5
-2
0.5
If , find .
Assuming is continuously differential both itself and its inverse, decide whether vanishes if
No, it doesn't vanish given equals inverse direct slope at
Yes, disappearing occurs because equates inverse reciprocal slope at
Vanishing doesn't follow since the existence of relies upon direct relationship between and its slope
Disappearance isn't guaranteed unless additionally provided info on behavior of around specified point
Given that and that the inverse function , which rule justifies computing the derivative of ?
Quotient rule because it deals with division between two functions which applies indirectly here.
Implicit differentiation because it allows for differentiation with respect to indirectly through .
Power rule because it applies directly to functions raised to a power like .
Chain rule because it can be used when one function is composed within another like .
If , find .
Once established that for some differentiable and invertible real-valued functions <math-inline>r</math-inline>
, , where also lies 's relative extremum?
It occurs wherever <math-inline>r^{-}</math-inline>
attains its greatest or least value unrelated to .
The extremum emerges at when is non-differentiable.
It's located at .
No such extremum exists because `'s derivative never zeroes out.
If , find .
Undefined

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
What is the derivative of the inverse function at if the original function's derivative at that point is ?
If for all in the domain of , and , what is the value of ?
-7
7
Given an invertible function with its inverse denoted as , which statement about their derivatives is correct when both derivatives exist?
where h(b)=a.
where h(b)=a.
where h(b)=a.
where h(b)=a.