Composite, Implicit, and Inverse Functions
Given that the derivative of an inverse function can be found using , calculate if it's known that for a certain value of c, and .
2
-0.5
-2
0.5
Given that and that the inverse function , which rule justifies computing the derivative of ?
Quotient rule because it deals with division between two functions which applies indirectly here.
Implicit differentiation because it allows for differentiation with respect to indirectly through .
Power rule because it applies directly to functions raised to a power like .
Chain rule because it can be used when one function is composed within another like .
Given that is an invertible function with a continuous derivative and , what would be ?
If is a continuous and differentiable function with an inverse , what conditions must be true for to also be continuous and differentiable?
The original function, , cannot have any discontinuities or sharp corners on its domain.
The original function, , must be monotonically increasing or decreasing and have a non-zero derivative everywhere on its domain.
There are no specific conditions; all functions have continuous and differentiable inverses.
The original function, , can have zero as its derivative anywhere on its domain.
If , find .
Undefined
Which expression represents a correct application of differentiating an inverse trigonometric function such as arcsin()?
If and , what is the value of at ?

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
If , find .
If , find .
Undefined
Assuming is continuously differential both itself and its inverse, decide whether vanishes if
No, it doesn't vanish given equals inverse direct slope at
Yes, disappearing occurs because equates inverse reciprocal slope at
Vanishing doesn't follow since the existence of relies upon direct relationship between and its slope
Disappearance isn't guaranteed unless additionally provided info on behavior of around specified point