Integration and Accumulation of Change
To determine if converges or diverges, what initial approach should be taken?
Directly compute its antiderivative over since sine is bounded between -1 and +1 which ensures convergence without needing limits initially.
Break up the integral into intervals over which sine is continuous (like multiples of ), replace infinity with a limit variable such as , evaluate each piecewise section using limits, then sum them if possible.
Utilize comparison test by comparing it to another related function which is easier to integrate over without setting up piecewise sections first.
Apply Laplace transform techniques on prior to determining convergence or divergence since they offer another way of handling functions over infinite intervals directly.
What conclusion can be drawn from applying L'Hôpital's rule repeatedly to evaluate where and integer ?
The result oscillates between positive and negative values indicating inconclusive behavior for any .
It results in zero if representing convergence.
It simplifies to indicating convergence regardless of .
Applying L'Hôpital's rule indefinitely yields infinity suggesting divergence for all .
If converges, what must be true about the value of ?
What do you conclude about an improper integral when its antiderivative approaches a constant as x approaches infinity?
The improper integral cannot be determined from this information
the improper integral depends on the lower limits of integration
The improper integral diverges
The improper integral converges
What is the correct statement regarding a Type II improper integral?
The interval of integration is infinite.
The limit of integration is undefined.
The integrand is discontinuous on the interval of integration.
The integrand is unbounded on the interval of integration.
Which of the following represents an improper integral?
How do you evaluate the improper integral from -infinity to +infinity ?
Try to apply L'Hopital's Rule before setting up limits for the integral split.
Treat the integral as a whole and use trapezoidal rule for numerical approximation.
Split the integral into two parts, one from -infinity to some constant c, and another from c to infinity by taking limits for both parts.
Use Gaussian's exponential functions methods for direct evaluation without splitting or taking limits.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
How does evaluating the limit demonstrate a condition for convergence of an improper integral?
If the limit exists but is infinite, then it converges.
Convergence cannot be determined solely by limits in this context.
If the limit exists and is finite, then the improper integral converges.
The existence of this limit implies divergence regardless of its value.
Which technique best proves convergence/divergence for ?
Integration by parts techniques offer alternative ways of looking at the problem at hand, giving insight into various aspects that might otherwise be overlooked.
Ratio tests provide a means of gauging the relative strengths and weaknesses of differing terms, helping to decide the course of action accordingly.
Limit comparison rules allow us to confirm suspected behaviors based upon established facts and prior knowledge beforehand.
Direct comparisons tests against a lower bound provided the basis for proving the upper bound's existence, thereby confirming the former statement's truthfulness.
What does it mean for an improper integral to converge?
The integral has an infinite value.
The integral approaches zero.
The integral has a finite value.
The integral oscillates between positive and negative values.