Organizing Information for a Specific Audience

Authors utilize personal experiences and related parties to effectively detract attention from credible sources necessary for building a logical, fact-based case for health care reform.

Incorrectly used anecdotes could result in misleading generalizations being drawn based upon isolated incidents instead of establishing broader truths.

They create a stronger connection with the audience through relatable stories while still providing hard facts.

Authors incorporate anecdotes simply as filler material, taking up space without meaningful contribution towards advancing the line of reasoning behind proposed reforms.

To alienate listeners who are not well-versed in technology-related fields.

To simplify complex concepts making them easier for any listener to understand.

To engage younger demographics more familiar with tech-savvy terminologies.

To demonstrate expertise and specifically address knowledgeable audiences.

Offering straightforward advice for following societal norms without critique.

Incorporating extensive technical jargon specific to computer engineering disciplines.

Employing irony by exaggerating commonly accepted behaviors to highlight their absurdity.

Listing factual information regarding population demographics without interpretative commentary.

It weakens the original stance by introducing conflicting viewpoints.

It confuses readers about what position the writer is advocating for.

It strengthens the overall argument by showing consideration of multiple perspectives.

It distracts the reader from the main points being made in the essay.

Analyzing the evidence in relation to the prompt.

Using transitions to smoothly incorporate evidence.

Presenting evidence to refute counterarguments.

Using rhetorical appeals to persuade the reader.

To provide background information and context.

To analyze the purpose of the essay.

To use rhetorical strategies to persuade the reader.

To support the thesis and arguments.

Creating confusion with conflicting viewpoints.

Establishing credibility through appeal to authority.

Providing entertainment through anecdotal humor within debate.

Overshadowing original arguments with external voices.

Relying on personal opinions over established facts..

Using jargon that confuses instead of clarifies points made...

Including irrelevant facts to fill space...

Providing citations from reliable sources.

Overshadow other rhetorical strategies employed throughout the piece leading to imbalance and focus.

Detract from the substance of the message by appearing overtly emotional and unprofessional.

Encourage trust and build rapport with the audience while firmly conveying the message.

Confuse the audience by mixing strong feelings with polite language when discussing serious issues.

Semicolon

Comma

Exclamation point

Apostrophe