Perspectives and How Arguments Relate
Which of the following is an important aspect of incorporating evidence in an argumentative essay?
Excluding statistics and data
Quoting or paraphrasing information
Omitting evidence from the essay
Using outdated sources
How might a writer subtly discredit opposing viewpoints within an argument supporting free trade policies?
Employing straw man fallacies intentionally misrepresenting protectionist arguments as weaker than they are presented.
Through extensive quoting from well-regarded economists who advocate firmly for free trade principles over protectionism.
By highlighting inconsistencies within counterarguments using thorough comparative analysis of cited sources’ methodologies.
Relying on pathos by sharing success stories from countries thriving economically due to embracing free trade agreements.
What technique might a writer use to make an emotional connection with the reader?
Deductive reasoning
Personal testimony
Counterargument presentation
Factual data
Which option identifies a hasty generalization?
Assuming two events are connected simply because they occur together.
Presenting only two options when more exist in reality.
Rejecting an argument by questioning the speaker’s expertise or education on the subject matter.
Making a broad statement based on limited or insufficient evidence.
What kind if supporting detail is most effective when arguing that modern technology has increased human connectivity?
Philosophical musings the nature interconnectedness predating digital era may be thought provoking but fail offer concrete contemporary relevance.
Personal anecdotes describing individual experiences finding friendship through online platforms, while impactful, lack wider applicability.
Recent sociological studies linking increased smartphone use with higher reported levels community involvement worldwide.
References famous speeches praising advances communication technology can inspire but might not convincingly argue actual increase human connectivity across board
Which rhetorical strategy most effectively emphasizes the urgency of a situation in an argumentative essay?
Metonymy, by substituting associated names or concepts to indirectly address the situation.
Synecdoche, using a part to represent the whole for stylistic emphasis on the situation's components.
Euphemism, to soften the intensity of language concerning the critical issue.
Anaphora, through the repetition of a leading phrase, to create a sense of immediacy and importance.
What method should be employed when writing about polarizing social issues to ensure both sides are presented fairly while maintaining a strong central thesis?
Enumerating all possible perspectives in random order thus leaving it up to readers to determine validity.
Writing separate sections exclusively supporting each viewpoint without acknowledging contradictions between them.
Juxtaposing counterarguments alongside main points before refuting them systematically with evidence.
Focusing solely on anecdotal experiences from individuals representing both sides of the issue without analysis.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
What kind of evidence uses credible authorities to strengthen an argument?
Anecdotal experiences.
Personal observations.
Expert testimony.
Popular opinion.
When considering the audience for an argumentative essay, it is important to select evidence that is:
Unpersuasive to the target audience
Unsupported by credible sources
Biased and one-sided
Persuasive to the target audience
In a persuasive essay that argues for the importance of environmental conservation, which rhetorical strategy would most effectively appeal to a reader's sense of responsibility?
Statistical evidence showing the rise in global temperatures over time.
Technical explanations of renewable energy technologies and their efficiencies.
Anecdotes about affected communities taking action to preserve their local environment.
A comparison of current environmental policies with those from fifty years ago.