Perspectives and How Arguments Relate

Assuming two events are connected simply because they occur together.

Presenting only two options when more exist in reality.

Rejecting an argument by questioning the speaker’s expertise or education on the subject matter.

Making a broad statement based on limited or insufficient evidence.

Philosophical musings the nature interconnectedness predating digital era may be thought provoking but fail offer concrete contemporary relevance.

Personal anecdotes describing individual experiences finding friendship through online platforms, while impactful, lack wider applicability.

Recent sociological studies linking increased smartphone use with higher reported levels community involvement worldwide.

References famous speeches praising advances communication technology can inspire but might not convincingly argue actual increase human connectivity across board

Metonymy, by substituting associated names or concepts to indirectly address the situation.

Synecdoche, using a part to represent the whole for stylistic emphasis on the situation's components.

Euphemism, to soften the intensity of language concerning the critical issue.

Anaphora, through the repetition of a leading phrase, to create a sense of immediacy and importance.

Enumerating all possible perspectives in random order thus leaving it up to readers to determine validity.

Writing separate sections exclusively supporting each viewpoint without acknowledging contradictions between them.

Juxtaposing counterarguments alongside main points before refuting them systematically with evidence.

Focusing solely on anecdotal experiences from individuals representing both sides of the issue without analysis.

Excluding statistics and data

Quoting or paraphrasing information

Omitting evidence from the essay

Using outdated sources

Employing straw man fallacies intentionally misrepresenting protectionist arguments as weaker than they are presented.

Through extensive quoting from well-regarded economists who advocate firmly for free trade principles over protectionism.

By highlighting inconsistencies within counterarguments using thorough comparative analysis of cited sources’ methodologies.

Relying on pathos by sharing success stories from countries thriving economically due to embracing free trade agreements.

Deductive reasoning

Personal testimony

Counterargument presentation

Factual data

Current statistics from credible organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Peer-reviewed articles supporting environmental theories mentioned in the argument.

Personal anecdotes unrelated to scientific research or empirical data.

Historical examples demonstrating successful conservation efforts in various countries.

Choose reliable sources

Use personal opinions

Include unrelated information

Utilize anecdotal evidence

Relying heavily on complex educational theories unfamiliar to the average parent.

Emphasizing personal opinions about school schedules without citing empirical studies.

Presenting vague future predictions about student success rates post-graduation.

Incorporating credible statistics on academic improvement alongside relatable parental concerns.