Position, Perspective, and Bias
When revising an argumentative essay in light of new evidence suggesting that previous claims were overstated, which strategy would best adjust the argument?
How might an author adjust their argument in a persuasive speech when presented with new evidence that contradicts their original claim?
In the context of adjusting an argument to address new evidence, why is it important to consider the potential biases in the new evidence?
Why would an author include statistical data in an argument?
What does incorporating new evidence into an argumentative essay primarily aim to do?
For an op-ed writer critiquing reliance on fossil fuels, how might they revise their position if presented with substantial advancements in clean coal technology?
If an editor opts to substitute 'innovative solutions' for 'practical ones' in a discussion of the climate crisis, how does the implied message to the audience alter?
How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
How might the historical context of the Women's Suffrage Movement in the early 20th century impact a writer's use of rhetorical techniques when arguing for gender equality?
In constructing an argument about workers' rights during the Industrial Revolution, how might a speaker adjust their rhetoric upon learning about recent factory legislation?
Which form of evidence often appeals to emotions and can personalize an argument?