Stylistic Choices
What type of diction would best describe use of everyday language in speech or writing?
Abstract
Colloquial
Formal
Jargon
In what way does a writer’s strategic use of polysyndeton most likely shape an audience’s reaction?
It creates a sense of overwhelming abundance or complexity.
It accentuates individual items within a series for isolation effect.
It simplifies sentences for easier comprehension and retention.
It promotes quicker reading pace due to reduced punctuation marks.
Which rhetorical strategy enhances persuasiveness by addressing potential objections within your argument?
Metaphor
Personification
Hyperbole
Counterargument
Which nuance in syntax would best emphasize contrast within a political candidate's speech concerning domestic policy versus foreign affairs?
Juxtaposing short, emphatic sentences when discussing domestic policy against complex sentences with multiple clauses for foreign affairs.
Utilizing compound sentences equally throughout sections on both domestic policy and foreign affairs for balanced presentation.
Employing parallel structure throughout points on both policies for stylistic consistency and cohesive transitions between topics.
Starting each point about domestic policy with interrogative phrases whereas declarative statements are used for foreign affairs.
In persuasive writing, when a writer cites recognized experts in the field they are discussing, what type of evidence are they using?
Universal truths
Personal anecdotes
Hypothetical situations
Expert testimony
How does the use of "thrive" instead of "survive" in a text about ecosystems primarily influence the reader's perception?
It emphasizes the harshness and difficulty of living within ecosystems.
It suggests a positive and flourishing state rather than mere existence.
It implies a neutral stance towards the success or failure of organisms.
It indicates an impending danger threatening the stability of ecosystems.
How does the use of formal language in a speech primarily affect the speaker's credibility with an academic audience?
It decreases the speaker’s credibility due to potential perceptions of aloofness or arrogance.
It has no significant impact on credibility but may affect the pacing and delivery of content.
It undermines the speaker's credibility by creating a barrier to understanding complex ideas.
It enhances the speaker’s credibility by demonstrating professionalism and respect for the subject matter.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
What type of sentence structure can help clarify relationships between ideas in an argumentative essay?
Run-on sentences
Compound sentences
Disjointed lists
Sentence fragments
When a writer employs euphemisms, they are primarily trying to:
Soften or downplay harsh or unpleasant language
Convey complex ideas more clearly
Use figurative language for emphasis
Create a formal and academic tone
When comparing speeches about social reform, which subtle shift in diction would most significantly alter the tone from neutral to urgent?
Adjusting descriptors related to time from general to more specific terms, like "in future years" to "this year."
Modifying quantitative words from vague to precise numbers, for example "some people" to "three out of five people."
Changing verbs that connote possibility to ones implying necessity, such as "can begin" to "must enact."
Transitioning adjectives describing social issues from passive to active voice, changing “is observed” to “demands observation.”