Caesar, Gallic War, Book 5, Part II, Book 6, and Book 7

A disorganized retreat.

A swift counterattack.

A determined defense.

A call for immediate surrender.

A series of trenches filled with water.

120 towers using collected timber.

A network of underground tunnels for escape.

A large catapult to launch projectiles.

The Roman tactics were ineffective, leading to a swift Gallic victory.

The Gallic tactics were ineffective due to the superior Roman training.

Both sides experienced successes and setbacks, leading to a prolonged and intense siege.

Both sides avoided direct confrontation, resulting in a stalemate.

The siege had no lasting impact on the conflict.

A Roman victory would solidify their control over Gaul, while a Gallic victory could inspire further rebellions.

A Roman victory would lead to immediate peace negotiations, while a Gallic victory would result in a Roman withdrawal from Gaul.

The siege would lead to a shift in alliances among the Gallic tribes, regardless of the outcome.

The Nervii.

The Aduatuci.

The Remi.

The Treveri.

A direct frontal assault.

A surprise attack before news of Titurius's death reached Cicero.

A feigned retreat to lure the Romans out of their fortifications.

A siege using heavy artillery.

To negotiate a peace treaty with Caesar.

To consolidate power within his own tribe.

To incite a widespread rebellion against the Romans by rallying other tribes.

To seek refuge in a more defensible location.

He offered them financial incentives.

He exaggerated Roman losses and promised liberation from Roman injustices.

He threatened them with military force if they did not comply.

He promised them Roman citizenship after the rebellion.

By delegating all responsibilities to his subordinates.

By sending messengers to negotiate a truce with Ambiorix.

By working tirelessly despite being ill and inspiring his soldiers.

By hoarding resources for himself and his inner circle.

The Romans relied on speed and mobility, while the Gauls focused on fortifications.

The Romans focused on coordinated, multi-tribal assaults, while the Gauls emphasized individual combat.

The Romans used fortifications and resourcefulness while the Gauls relied on speed and the belief that victory would secure their freedom.

The Romans preferred open-field battles, while the Gauls favored ambushes.