Caesar, Gallic War, Book 5, Part II, Book 6, and Book 7

He immediately seeks a retreat rather than confronting the issue.

He relies heavily on subordinates’ counsel before making decisions.

He remains composed under pressure maintaining order.

Euphemism softens severity incidents potentially reducing perceived seriousness.

Apostrophe addresses absent entities or personified concepts which may distract from immediate actions needed.

Metonymy replaces terms related ones causing potential confusion identifying exact nature problems.

Hyperbaton allows unexpected word orders highlighting critical information quickly grabbing attention.

It portrays their actions as stubborn rather than determined.

It emphasizes their honorable conduct in battle.

It underscores their alignment with Roman military virtues.

It highlights their strategic approach to warfare.

Allegory

Personification

Metonymy

Synecdoche

Gaius Fabius

Lucius Aurunculeius Cotta

Titus Labienus

Quintus Cicero

INCORRECT 2. Alliteration draws attention to certain phrases thus highlighting pivotal moments that define character decisions during crises.

CORRECT. Dramatic irony deepens complexity by revealing discrepancies between characters’ perceptions versus reality known by readers.

INCORRECT 3. Anaphora emphasizes resolve in speeches depicting collective sentiment among troops impacting views on unity and morale.

INCORRECT 1. Metaphors enrich images of heroism on both sides for enhanced pathos toward all combatants engaged in battle scenes.

To punish tribes that had aided the mainland Gauls.

To establish a permanent Roman settlement.

To gather intelligence on Germanic tribes.

To explore unknown territories for Rome’s expansion.

Zeugma

Anaphora

Chiasmus

Enjambment

He attempted bribery with promises of gold and land if they betrayed Rome

He tricked them into believing an attack would come at night so they would flee in fear

He threatened them with reinforcements arriving soon if they did not surrender immediately

He offered them safe passage if they abandoned their camp during negotiations with Cicero's men

It underlines an element of surprise used by Romans during attacks

It reflects heightened anticipation among troops preceding engagements

It suggests panic or disorder rather than efficiency

It diminishes any sense that Romans were caught off-guard by sudden events