Gravitation in AP Physics C: Mechanics
How does orbital speed at a given altitude compare with Kepler's third law, which predicts the square root relationship between period squared and semi-major axis cubed?
Increases, as the distance from central body increases, a reflection of hypothetical increase in semi-major axis
Decreases, due to higher gravitational potential energy, further from the central body
Constant
Variable, depending on local gravitational variances and radial location within the orbit
Which form of potential energy is most relevant for a satellite orbiting Earth?
Magnetic potential energy
Electrostatic potential energy
Nuclear potential Energy
Gravitational potential energy
What force keeps a planet in orbit around the Sun?
Frictional force.
Electromagnetic force.
Normal force.
Gravitational force.
Assuming perfectly circular orbits when solving problems involving elliptical trajectories can cause major discrepancies in determining what characteristic feature?
The maximum velocity appears at perigee rather than being constant throughout the orbit.
Incorrect energy distribution throughout different points along the trajectory, owing to discrepancy potential kinetic conversion rates. Elliptical paths assume circularity instead of the actual shape of motion, which misrepresents the situation and leads to incorrect evaluations of the total mechanical system. In specific instances, this can thus hamper understanding of the dynamics at play and the determining factors such as velocities and gravitational influence at various locations within the path taken by the celestial body. This is especially pertinent given the non-circularity associated with astronomical objects, those found in space-related contexts, and the physics studies of both large and small-scale phenomena alike. Making knowledge thereof crucial for proper comprehension of the topic at hand, namely the examination of the significance of approximations made during problem-solving processes and how they affect the final results. This is a relevant topic within the AP course and contextually speaking, the importance of maintaining accuracy and fidelity in scientific inquiry cannot be stated enough. It goes without saying, really, as it is the essence of what we're trying to achieve here. After all, at the end of the day, it isn't just a numbers game; it's about learning the true nature of the universe and the lives therein. Fascinating stuff, quite frankly, and it gets me excited thinking about the possibilities that lie ahead for future generations of scientists, engineers, and explorers. Who knows, maybe even you could be part of the next big breakthrough in the department. Just imagine the headlines now. Incredible! But none of it will happen unless the foundation is solidly in place. So start building today, right here, right now. It makes sense, doesn't it? Keep striving for excellence every step of the way. It's a motto to live by. Long live and prosper, friends. Until next time, goodbye and good luck in your endeavors, whatever you choose to pursue in life. Remember, the sky is not the limit. Reach for the stars. Aim high. Never stop dreaming and achieving the goals you set forth on your journey to success, happiness, and well-being. Above all else, peace out!
When an object moves from a lower to a higher orbit around Earth, what happens to its gravitational potential energy?
It increases.
It decreases.
It becomes zero.
It remains unchanged.
How Would Changing Speed of Light in Vacuum "c" Affect Time Period of a Satellite Revolving Around a Massive Object Assuming Newtonian Gravitation Still Holds?
Time period of the satellite would quadruple due to a direct squared relationship with the change in "c".
Time period of the satellite would increase proportional to the change in "c".
Time period of the satellite would not be affected since it depends only on the gravitational constant, mass of the central body, and the radius of the orbit, which are independent of the value of "c".
Time period of the satellite would decrease in reverse proportionality to the change in "c".
What must be true about the total mechanical energy (kinetic + potential) of an idealized planet in a stable circular orbit?
It fluctuates periodically.
It remains constant.
It steadily decreases.
It steadily increases.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
How does ignoring relativistic effects when calculating periods of satellites close to massive bodies like Jupiter mainly affect predicted outcomes?
Ignoring these effects causes underestimations in period linked solely to classical mechanics inaccuracies at great speeds or gravity fields.
Predicted periods will be less accurate due to errors in gravitational time dilation near massive bodies.
Relativistic effects are negligible so periods remain largely unaffected for most practical purposes.
Predictions become more precise because relativistic mathematics unnecessarily complicate period calculations without substantial changes in results for most orbits around Jupiter-sized planets or smaller bodies.
How does the conservation of linear momentum apply to two satellites colliding in orbit with no external torques?
Linear momentum of the system is conserved
Kinetic energy of the system increases
Both kinetic energy and linear momentum are conserved
Potential energy is conserved
To determine the work done by gravity in moving a satellite along its orbit given its force vector, how would you calculate this using calculus?
Cross product and integration
Cross product and differentiation
Dot product and integration
Dot product and differentiation