Looking at the problem or issue from different perspectives

Zoe Flores
6 min read
Study Guide Overview
This study guide covers source credibility evaluation for AP Research using the RAVEN framework (Reputation, Ability to Investigate, Vested Interest, Expertise, Neutrality). It explains how to apply RAVEN, emphasizing the importance of credible sources, peer-reviewed studies, publication dates, bias awareness, and research methodology. Practice questions and exam tips are also included.
#AP Research: Credibility & Source Evaluation 🧐
Hey there, future AP Research master! Let's dive into making sure your research is rock-solid. We're moving past just how to research and focusing on how to ensure your research is credible. This is crucial for a high score! Think of this as your final pre-exam check-in. Let's get started!
#Why Credibility Matters
Credible sources are the backbone of strong research. They ensure your information is:
- Accurate: Free from errors and mistakes.
- Reliable: Consistent and dependable.
- Trustworthy: Unbiased and honest.
Using credible sources boosts the validity of your entire project. It's like building a house on a solid foundation—essential for success! 🏠
Using credible sources is essential to ensure that findings are accurate, reliable and trustworthy.
#The RAVEN Framework for Source Analysis 🦅
Time to unleash your inner detective! Use RAVEN to analyze source credibility:
#R - Reputation
- Who is the author? Look into their background: Where do they work? What are their credentials? What else have they published?
- Example: A researcher from a top university with numerous publications in the field has a strong reputation.
#A - Ability to Investigate
- How did they gather their data? Do they have the resources and access necessary for their research? Think about lab access, affiliations, and relevant memberships.
- Example: A psychologist affiliated with a major research institution likely has access to research participants and equipment.
#V - Vested Interest
- Do they have a stake in the results? Is there any potential bias? Could they benefit from a particular outcome?
- Example: A study funded by a pharmaceutical company might have a vested interest...

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve