Comparing Parliamentary, Presidential, and Semi-Presidential Systems

Ella Carter
7 min read
Listen to this study note
Study Guide Overview
This study guide compares parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems, focusing on the UK, Mexico, Nigeria, and Russia. It covers the separation of powers, checks and balances, and policy-making processes within each system. Key differences in power allocation and the impact of regime type (democratic vs. authoritarian) are highlighted. Practice questions and exam tips are included.
#AP Comparative Government: Comparing Government Systems ποΈ
Hey there, future AP Comp Gov expert! π Let's dive into a comparison of parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems. This is crucial for acing your exam, so let's make sure it sticks!
#2.2 Comparing Parliamentary, Presidential, and Semi-Presidential Systems
#Quick Comparison Chart
Here's a handy chart to get us started. Think of it as your cheat sheet for the night before the exam! π
Pt. of Comparison | Parliamentary System | Presidential System | Semi-Presidential System |
---|---|---|---|
Branches | No separation of powers | Separation of powers | Separation of powers |
Power | Lies with the legislature | Specific powers within each branch | Specific powers within each branch |
Elections | Legislature elected by the people directly | Executive and legislative branches voted on by the people directly | Executive branch voted on by the people directly/President appoints prime Minister and cabinet |
Roles | Prime Minister | President/Legislature | President/Prime Minister coexist |
Function | Typically less gridlock | Gridlock is common problem | Little gridlock as Prime Minister is typically an administrative role |
#
Parliamentary Systems: Fused Power
-
No Separation of Powers: Like in the UK π¬π§, the executive and legislative branches are fusedβthey're basically one and the same. Think of it like a super-efficient, well-oiled machine. βοΈ
-
Power Dynamics: The legislature (Parliament) chooses the Prime Minister, who is usually the leader of the majority party. This means less gridlock and faster policy-making. β
-
Example: Devolution in the UK in the 1990s happened quickly because the PM had strong support in Parliament.
π Reminder: Need a refresher on devolution? Check out the Unit 1 Study Guide <>
#Presidential Systems: Separated Power
- Separation of Powers: Like in Mexico π²π½ and Nigeria π³π¬, the executive, legislative, and judicial branches are separate. This creates a system of checks and balances. βοΈ
- Power Dynamics: Each branch has its own specific powers, leading to potential gridlock. π¦
- Example: In Nigeria, the president's budget was rejected by the senate in 2016, showing a clear check on executive power. πΈ
#Semi-Presidential Systems: The Tricky Case of Russia
- Unique Structure: Russia π·πΊ has a semi-presidential system where both a President and a Prime Minister co-exist. However, this system is not a great comparison point for the following reasons:
-
Putin's Dominance: President Putin holds the real power, making it difficult to analyze the system's function in a typical semi-presidential way. πͺ
President Putin (commons.wikimedia.org)
Prime Minister Mishustin (commons.wikimedia.org)
-
Authoritarian Nature: Russia is an authoritarian regime, unlike the democratic systems of the UK, Mexico, and Nigeria. This difference in regime type makes direct comparison difficult. π
- Authoritarian Regimes: Decisions are made by political elites with little citizen input. π
- Democratic Regimes: Citizens have greater decision-making power through elections. π
-
#Checks and Balances in a Parliamentary System
Even though power is fused in a parliamentary system, there are still checks and balances. Let's look at the UK for examples:
-
Fixed-Term Elections: The UK has fixed-term elections every five years, limiting the Prime Minister's power to call snap elections. π³οΈ
- π‘ How does Parliament choose the PM? The monarch invites a member of the ruling party (or opposition) to command. If no PM can be selected, a General Election is called.
-
Questions of the Executive: The House of Commons holds regular Q&A sessions with the Prime Minister, allowing scrutiny from both the opposition and majority party. βClick here to watch past Prime Minister's Questions.
-
Censuring Cabinet Members: Parliament can also check the executive by censuring new cabinet members.
#
Final Exam Focus
- High-Priority Topics: Focus on the differences in power allocation between parliamentary and presidential systems. Understand the unique challenges of comparing semi-presidential systems due to authoritarian elements.
- Common Question Types: Expect questions that ask you to compare the efficiency of policy-making, the presence of checks and balances, and the impact of regime type on governmental functions.
- Time Management: Quickly identify the system type in the question and use your knowledge of the core countries to support your arguments.
- Common Pitfalls: Don't confuse the roles of the President and Prime Minister in different systems. Be clear about the differences between fused and separated powers. Avoid making direct comparisons between democratic and authoritarian regimes without acknowledging the fundamental differences.
#
Practice Question
Practice Questions
#Multiple Choice Questions
-
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the executive and legislative branches in a parliamentary system? (A) The branches are completely separate with equal powers. (B) The executive branch is subordinate to the legislative branch. (C) The executive and legislative branches are fused. (D) The legislative branch is subordinate to the executive branch.
-
In a presidential system, a check on the power of the executive branch is the ability of the: (A) Judiciary to appoint cabinet members. (B) Legislature to impeach the president. (C) Executive to dissolve the legislature. (D) Military to veto legislative decisions.
-
Which of the following is a key characteristic of a semi-presidential system? (A) A single executive leader with absolute power. (B) A fusion of executive and legislative powers. (C) A dual executive with a president and prime minister. (D) A system where the legislature directly appoints the head of state.
#Free Response Question
Prompt: Compare and contrast the policy-making processes in a parliamentary system and a presidential system. In your response, be sure to:
- Define the key characteristics of each system.
- Discuss the impact of the separation of powers (or lack thereof) on policy-making.
- Provide specific examples from course countries to support your claims.
Point-by-Point Scoring Breakdown:
- Point 1: Definition of a parliamentary system (1 point)
- Must include the concept of fused executive and legislative branches.
- Point 2: Definition of a presidential system (1 point)
- Must include the concept of separated powers.
- Point 3: Discussion of policy-making in a parliamentary system (1 point)
- Should mention the efficiency and speed of policy-making due to fused powers.
- Point 4: Discussion of policy-making in a presidential system (1 point)
- Should mention potential gridlock and checks on power.
- Point 5: Example from a parliamentary system (1 point)
- Example: UK's devolution in the 1990s
- Point 6: Example from a presidential system (1 point)
- Example: Nigeria's senate rejecting the president's budget
Let's crush this exam! πͺ You've got this! π
Explore more resources

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve