Psychology of Social Situations

Elijah Flores
10 min read
Listen to this study note
Study Guide Overview
This AP Psychology study guide covers social psychology concepts, including social norms, social influence (normative and informational), and persuasion techniques. It explores conformity and obedience, analyzing factors influencing both. The guide also examines group behavior effects (e.g., groupthink, social loafing), cultural influences, and prosocial behavior. Finally, it provides exam tips and practice questions covering these key areas.
#AP Psychology: Social Psychology - The Ultimate Study Guide 🚀
Hey there, future AP Psych pro! Let's dive into the fascinating world of social psychology. This guide is designed to be your go-to resource, especially the night before the big exam. We'll break down complex topics into easy-to-digest bits, sprinkle in some memory aids, and get you feeling confident and ready to ace this thing!
#Social Situations and Behavior
#Social Norms and Expectations
- Social norms are the unwritten rules that dictate how we should behave in different situations. Think of them as the 'do's' and 'don'ts' of social life. 🎭
- These norms are like scripts for our social interactions, guiding our behavior in formal events, casual hangouts, and everything in between.
- They also define our social roles – the parts we play in society based on age, gender, and status.
Remember, social norms aren't universal; they vary widely across different cultures and subcultures.
#Types of Social Influence
- Normative influence: This is all about fitting in. We conform to group norms to avoid rejection and gain acceptance. It's like wanting to be part of the 'in' crowd.
- Informational influence: This occurs when we look to others for guidance, especially in confusing situations. We assume that others know what they're doing, so we follow their lead. 💡
#Techniques of Persuasion
- Central route to persuasion: This involves critical thinking and evaluating arguments. It's like using logic and reason to make a decision. This route leads to lasting attitude changes.
- Peripheral route to persuasion: This relies on superficial cues and emotional appeals. Think celebrity endorsements or catchy slogans. It's all about the feels, not the facts.
- Halo effect: When we see someone as attractive, we tend to assume they have other positive qualities too. It's like thinking a good-looking person must also be kind and smart.
- Foot-in-the-door technique: Start with a small request, then make a bigger one. People are more likely to agree to the big request if they've already agreed to the small one. It's like getting your foot in the door.
- Door-in-the-face technique: Start with a huge request that you know will be rejected, then make a more reasonable one. The second request seems like a compromise, making it more likely to be accepted.
Central vs. Peripheral: Think of a central argument as a well-built fortress, strong and logical, while a peripheral argument is like a flashy billboard, appealing but not as sturdy.
#Conditions for Conformity
- Group size: The bigger the group, the more pressure there is to conform.
- Unanimity: If everyone agrees, it's harder to dissent. A single dissenter can break the spell of conformity.
- Task difficulty: When tasks are ambiguous or difficult, we're more likely to conform because we seek guidance from others.
- Personal importance: If we care a lot about an issue, we're less likely to conform. We're more likely to stick to our own beliefs.
#Conditions for Obedience
- Authority figure: The more legitimate the authority, the more likely we are to obey. Think of a police officer or a military leader. 👮♂️
- Proximity of authority: The closer the authority figure is, the more likely we are to obey.
- Gradual escalation: Obedience increases when commands are given in small steps. It's like slowly turning up the heat on a frog.
- Diffusion of responsibility: When others are present, we feel less personally responsible, making us more likely to obey.
#Group Effects on Individual Behavior
#Cultural Influences on Perception
- Individualistic cultures: These cultures emphasize personal goals and independence. Think of the US, where people are encouraged to be unique and self-reliant.
- Collectivistic cultures: These cultures prioritize group harmony and interdependence. Think of Japan, where people are expected to put the needs of the group before their own.
- Multiculturalism: This recognizes and values diversity within a society, fostering tolerance and adaptability.
#Group Membership's Behavioral Impact
- Group polarization: When like-minded people discuss an issue, their views become more extreme. It's like an echo chamber amplifying existing attitudes.
- Groupthink: This occurs when the desire for harmony overrides critical thinking, leading to bad decisions. It's like everyone agreeing just to avoid conflict.
- Diffusion of responsibility: In a group, we feel less personally accountable for our actions.
- Bystander effect: The more people present in an emergency, the less likely anyone is to help. It's like everyone waiting for someone else to act.
- Social loafing: We tend to exert less effort when working in a group, assuming our contributions aren't critical. It's like thinking someone else will pick up the slack.
- Deindividuation: In a group, we can lose self-awareness and restraint, leading to impulsive behavior. It's like getting caught up in the moment.
#Social Facilitation in Groups
- Simple tasks: The presence of others can boost performance on tasks we're good at. It's like having a cheering crowd pushing you to do better.
- Complex tasks: The presence of others can hinder performance on tasks we're not familiar with. It's like stage fright making you forget your lines.
#False Consensus Effect
- We tend to overestimate how much others agree with us. It's like thinking everyone shares your opinions, even when they don't.
#Superordinate Goals vs. Social Traps
- Superordinate goals: These are shared objectives that require cooperation, reducing conflict. Think of the International Space Station, where different countries work together for a common goal. 🚀
- Social traps: These occur when we prioritize short-term self-interest over long-term collective well-being. It's like overfishing, where everyone benefits in the short term, but the resource is depleted in the long run.
#Industrial-Organizational Psychology Concepts
- Job satisfaction: How happy employees are with their work and workplace. Factors include pay, work-life balance, and relationships with colleagues.
- Organizational culture: The shared values and practices within a company, shaping employee behavior and communication.
- Burnout: Emotional, mental, and physical exhaustion caused by work stress. It's like running on empty.
#Prosocial Behavior's Effects
#Altruism and Social Norms
- Social reciprocity norm: We help others with the expectation that they'll help us in the future. It's like scratching each other's backs.
- Social responsibility norm: We help those in need, even if we don't expect anything in return. It's like doing the right thing because it's the right thing to do.
#Bystander Effect Factors
- Diffusion of responsibility: The more people present, the less responsible we feel to help.
- Pluralistic ignorance: We assume that others are interpreting the situation differently, so we don't act.
- Evaluation apprehension: We fear being judged negatively for our actions, so we hesitate to help.
Remember: The bystander effect is a key concept in social psych - understand the factors that contribute to it.
Bystander Effect: Think of a crowded room where everyone assumes someone else will handle the situation, and so no one does. The more people, the less likely anyone is to act.
#Final Exam Focus
Alright, let's focus on what's most important for the exam. These topics are frequently tested and are crucial for a high score:
- Social Influence: Understand the differences between normative and informational influence, and how they affect conformity.
- Conformity and Obedience: Know the factors that increase or decrease conformity and obedience. Milgram's and Asch's experiments are classic examples.
- Group Dynamics: Groupthink, social loafing, and the bystander effect are frequently tested. Be able to explain them and give examples.
- Cultural Influences: Understand the differences between individualistic and collectivistic cultures and how they impact behavior.
- Prosocial Behavior: Know the norms that drive helping behavior and the factors that inhibit it.
For FRQs, make sure to define the key terms and apply them to the scenario. For MCQs, look for keywords in the question that point to specific concepts.
#Last-Minute Tips
- Time Management: Don't spend too long on any one question. If you're stuck, move on and come back later.
- Common Pitfalls: Avoid overthinking. Stick to the concepts you know and apply them directly to the questions.
- Strategies: For FRQs, start by outlining your answer. This will help you stay organized and hit all the points. For MCQs, eliminate the wrong answers first.
Social influence, conformity, obedience, group dynamics, and prosocial behavior are high-value topics. Focus on understanding these concepts thoroughly.
#
Practice Question
#Multiple Choice Questions
-
A person is more likely to conform to a group when: a) The group is small and the task is easy. b) The group is large and the task is ambiguous. c) The person is highly confident in their own beliefs. d) The person is in a familiar environment.
-
Which of the following best illustrates the concept of the bystander effect? a) A person helps a stranger in need because they feel it’s their social responsibility. b) A person is less likely to help someone in distress when others are present. c) A person conforms to group norms to avoid social rejection. d) A person is more likely to help someone when they are the only witness.
-
The foot-in-the-door technique is a persuasion method that involves: a) Starting with a large request and then making a smaller one. b) Using emotional appeals to persuade someone. c) Starting with a small request and then making a larger one. d) Relying on superficial cues to influence someone.
#Free Response Question
Scenario: A group of college students is working on a project together. Some members are contributing a lot, while others are doing very little. During a group meeting, one student suggests a solution that is clearly flawed, but no one speaks up to challenge it.
(a) Define and explain the concepts of social loafing and groupthink within the context of this scenario. (4 points) (b) Identify two factors that might be contributing to the bystander effect if one of the students were to experience a sudden medical emergency during the meeting. (4 points) (c) Describe one strategy the group could use to reduce the impact of social loafing and one strategy to prevent groupthink in future meetings. (4 points)
Scoring Breakdown:
(a) Social Loafing and Groupthink (4 points)
- Social Loafing Definition (1 point): Correctly defines social loafing as the tendency for people to exert less effort when working in a group compared to working alone.
- Social Loafing Application (1 point): Explains how some students in the scenario are contributing less effort to the project, demonstrating social loafing.
- Groupthink Definition (1 point): Correctly defines groupthink as a phenomenon where the desire for group harmony or conformity results in irrational or dysfunctional decision-making.
- Groupthink Application (1 point): Explains how the students’ failure to challenge the flawed solution demonstrates groupthink.
(b) Bystander Effect Factors (4 points)
- Factor 1 (2 points): Identifies and explains a relevant factor, such as diffusion of responsibility (people assume others will help) or pluralistic ignorance (people misinterpret the situation due to others' inaction).
- Factor 2 (2 points): Identifies and explains a second relevant factor, such as evaluation apprehension (fear of being judged for helping) or ambiguity of the situation (not knowing if it’s a real emergency).
(c) Strategies to Reduce Social Loafing and Groupthink (4 points)
- Social Loafing Strategy (2 points): Describes a strategy to reduce social loafing, such as assigning individual tasks, making individual contributions identifiable, or providing feedback on individual performance.
- Groupthink Strategy (2 points): Describes a strategy to prevent groupthink, such as encouraging critical evaluation, assigning a devil’s advocate, or seeking outside opinions.
You've got this! Remember, you're not just memorizing facts; you're understanding how social forces shape our behavior. Go rock that exam!
Explore more resources

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve