Synthesize Ideas
Which of the following best describes evidence in research?
Information that contradicts the research question.
Anything that backs up your claims.
Only numerical data and statistics.
Personal opinions unrelated to the research topic.
Which type of evidence is most suitable for establishing historical context?
Statistical analysis of current trends
Expert opinions from contemporary scholars
Primary source documents from the period being studied
Predictions based on current data models
Where would you most likely find peer-reviewed research articles?
A popular blog
A social media platform
Digital databases like EBSCO
A personal diary
Which of the following is a non-print source of evidence?
A research paper
A book
A video
A monograph
What are the limitations of using personal interviews as a primary source of evidence?
Interviews are always unbiased and objective.
Interview data is difficult to analyze.
Interviews can be time-consuming and may reflect interviewer bias or interviewee subjectivity.
Interviews provide only quantitative data.
What does the 'R' in S.A.R.C.C. stand for when evaluating evidence?
Reliable
Relevant
Repeatable
Researched
Which evidence is the most credible based on S.A.R.C.C. criteria?
A blog post from an anonymous author with no citations.
A peer-reviewed article published last month in a reputable journal.
A personal anecdote from a friend.
A news article from an unreliable source.

How are we doing?
Give us your feedback and let us know how we can improve
Which action represents 'cherry-picking' of evidence?
Selecting evidence that supports multiple claims.
Selecting only the evidence that supports your claim while ignoring contradictory evidence.
Selecting evidence from a variety of sources.
Selecting evidence that is easy to understand.
Which of the following is the best way to use evidence to define a complex concept?
Provide a personal opinion about the concept.
Use evidence to clarify terms and ideas.
Ignore the concept and focus on examples.
Use overly technical jargon to impress the audience.
How can expert opinions be used to strengthen an argument?
By dismissing all other forms of evidence.
By aligning with authority to back up your claims.
By confusing the audience with complex terminology.
By presenting opinions as irrefutable facts.